### Author Topic: Issues with general purpose of SimpleVector Class  (Read 2668 times)

#### gameCloner

• byte
• Posts: 2
##### Issues with general purpose of SimpleVector Class
« on: February 16, 2013, 03:18:59 pm »
Hi Helge and the jpct community.

first of all i would excuse me caus im no an expert poster, so i ask you to be kind in teaching me some.

im trying to code a ball game like tilt. im posting it soon if i can omn the forum.

i came across some code errors

Code: [Select]
`SimpleVector copy = globalPos; updateGlobalPos();  // or updateGlobalPos(globalPos) `this code affects copy as well. I understood i can not assign vectors as strings. To me it could be better to have a clone() and a equals() method in class.
example 2:
Code: [Select]
`float maxKnot = 12.f;public void interpolate(SimpleVector p1, SimpleVector p2){ SimpleVector delta = new SimpleVector(p1.x,p1.y,p1.z); delta.sub(p2); for ( int i = maxKnot ; i >0 ; i--){ SimpleVector temp= new SimpleVector(delta.x,delta.y,delta.z); temp.scalarMul( i  / maxKnot); temp.add(p2); points.add(temp); } }`to me that should look like this:
Code: [Select]
`public void interpolate(SimpleVector p1, SimpleVector p2){      p1.sub(p2);      for ( int i = maxKnot ; i >0 ; i--){ SimpleVector delta = p1.clone().scalarMul( alfa ).add(p2);                points.add( delta );`
it could be far better if we can add vectors the math style, as in c++ or as vertexShaders code.

« Last Edit: February 17, 2013, 12:26:22 pm by gameCloner »

#### EgonOlsen

• Administrator
• quad
• Posts: 12035
##### Re: Issues with general purpose of SimpleVector Class
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2013, 05:26:09 pm »
I don't get what you mean with your first example? You want to assign the content of globalPos to copy? Or create a copy of it? You can do both in several ways:

Code: [Select]
`SimpleVector copy=new SimpleVector(globalPos);..or...SimpleVector copy= SimpleVector.create(globalPos);..or to set it:copy.set(globalPos);`
equals() is implemented for SimpleVector.

You can't add SimpleVector (or anything except primitives and strings in Java) in math style, because there's no operator overloading in the language (thank god...).

I see your point, but if i would make all methods return the instance to concatenate their calls, nobody would be able to distinguish if that call creates a new instance or just returns "this". As it is now, if a method of SimpleVector returns a SimpleVector, you can be sure that it's a new instance. There are variants for add and sub called calcSub and calcAdd that return a new instance instead of working on "this".

« Last Edit: February 16, 2013, 06:18:00 pm by EgonOlsen »

#### gameCloner

• byte
• Posts: 2
##### Re: Issues with general purpose of SimpleVector Class
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2013, 06:10:25 pm »
You ve been clear.
I still cannot code as I usually do.
but I can bear with, every other one can bear with that, so I.

Thanks and be well.

#### EgonOlsen

• Administrator
• quad
• Posts: 12035
##### Re: Issues with general purpose of SimpleVector Class
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2013, 09:40:34 pm »
Just extend SimpleVector and add your way of doing it.