46
I'm stuck here, Egon. I assume that that's a recursion problem, but I can't see where the recursion happens.
News:
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
47
For now my little cheat is working (as did yours), so I moved this annoyance to the backburner. I'm getting interesting blitting behavior, which is to say that all blitting methods work sometimes, and all fail others (work on simple demos, fail on stress-test ones). Alas, it is also in the backburner.
So I'm back with the AWTGLRenderer, where I'm getting StackOverflowExceptions. Logger.log("AWTDisplayList.switchBuffers(): count: "+count +", Is vl[1] null? "+(vl[1]==null)) prints AWTDisplayList.switchBuffers(): count: 346, Is vl[1] null? True. And for more detail, execute prints the following block of commands and, when finished calling FrameBuffer.display() my test program prints "Rendered once." AWTDisplayList.vl[0] and vl[1] have both shown themselves to be null.
So I'm back with the AWTGLRenderer, where I'm getting StackOverflowExceptions. Logger.log("AWTDisplayList.switchBuffers(): count: "+count +", Is vl[1] null? "+(vl[1]==null)) prints AWTDisplayList.switchBuffers(): count: 346, Is vl[1] null? True. And for more detail, execute prints the following block of commands and, when finished calling FrameBuffer.display() my test program prints "Rendered once." AWTDisplayList.vl[0] and vl[1] have both shown themselves to be null.
Quote
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? False Init? TrueMODE_CLEAR: 2
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? False Init? TrueMODE_BLIT_TEXTURE: 4
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? False Init? TrueMODE_SET_FRUSTUM: 0
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? False Init? TrueMODE_REINIT: 23
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? False Init? TrueMODE_GRAB_SCREEN: 6
execute(int, object[]): Parameters null? True Init? TrueMODE_SWAP_BUFFERS: 1
AWTDisplayList.switchBuffers(): count: 346, Is vl[1] null? True
Canvas.switchList() completing.
Rendered once.
48
gx and gy are both 0. When I print the values of objVectorsnxTr[pos3] and invScaleFactor, as follows, I get the following output (at some point objVectorsnxTr[pos3] becomes 0).
Code: [Select]
Logger.log("objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: "+objVectorsnxTr[pos3] +", invScaleFactor: "+invScaleFactor);
Quote
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.02754658, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.3224086, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.001717074, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.5763285, invScaleFactor: 1
...
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.8757023, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.8600356, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.8600356, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.8709888, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9966896, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.4980774, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.3910597, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9446523, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.937071, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.07667674, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.8456958, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.1937691, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.5268521, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2584651, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.7911943, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.1983738, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.5489044, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.7925232, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.716369, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2036022, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.721458, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9182732, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.7018681, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.794013, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.5646043, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.6472638, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.1838191, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.4464325, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9402843, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.7470285, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.1453849, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.4424484, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.06958889, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.5219796, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.6994461, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.4723827, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2131859, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.5358245, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9231659, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.802191, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2096631, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9533308, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9807692, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9998421, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.766471, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.3366379, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.1630535, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.8853046, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2297132, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.08216921, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.970468, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.7117062, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.4429376, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.3802269, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2681608, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.923718, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9345775, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.8293254, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.6339014, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.2209611, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9219743, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.2492384, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.7921321, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9277812, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.995459, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9785283, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.7009124, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.084934, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.2503513, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.3185651, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.9098715, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.02948599, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9640496, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.4850884, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.5507149, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.2249548, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.2465971, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0.8845565, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.9476686, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: -0.8730187, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
objVectorsnxTr[pos3]: 0, invScaleFactor: 1
50
No, I knew that that was in transformVertices. It came down to another C# difference (Dictionary throwing an exception for not finding a key prompted me to catch it and create a new array in WorldProcessor.getArrays but I wasn't calling thread2Arrays.Add(tc, arrays) in the catch block). Voilá. Now to figure out why I'm only getting the ambient lighting. ; )
51
Found the issue, just don't get it. If it's not flatshaded, the following test will be false and even ambient lighting won't be calculated.
Code: [Select]
if (arrays[0][pos3] == 12345671 || isFlatShaded) { // Point already in the cache? Well then...
52
Support / Re: Object/Sprite Batching
« on: January 29, 2021, 09:29:45 am »
I have some examples of particle systems (fire, jetpack jet particles, even a fog of war) I did that were perfectly fast. I can look them up tomorrow.
54
Update: I had the epiphany of blitting the texture and calling setShadingMode(Object3D.SHADING_FAKED_FLAT). The texture blit looks perfect and SHADING_FAKED_FLAT made the model shade by the ambient light color (and still not by an added light), but fully and properly textured. I guess the problem would be in the gouraud shading block. Again, any direction would be greatly appreciated.
55
I'm not even where I was when I started porting this thing: now even when I don't call setTexture I get a solid black, unshaded model. Same models that were working before. I had SoftGLRenderer print System.Console.WriteLine("Pixel color: "+r +", "+g +", "+b +" Pixel: "+pixels[tx]) and I get for uint[] pixels the interesting value of 4,278,190,335 (binary 11111111000000000000000011111111) in drawShadedZbufferedFilteredScanline(). If you have any insights, please share them because I need them.
56
I'm not getting any lights, I think, since I ported World to 1.31. Everything I render with the software renderer is fully, flatly, black.
And by the way, software rendering on 1.31 is SO MUCH slower than on 1.03 (possibly the transparency additions but I would think it's because of the overall bloating of the code).
And by the way, software rendering on 1.31 is SO MUCH slower than on 1.03 (possibly the transparency additions but I would think it's because of the overall bloating of the code).
59
Support / Re: Issue with Texture.overrideTexelData
« on: January 19, 2021, 03:41:29 am »
It does look horizontally flipped, but obviously there's more to it than that. Try ORing the prixel data with the appropriate value (255?) to make sure it's opaque.