31
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 11, 2017, 06:56:29 am »
i tried, smaller value has no effect either.
News:
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 09, 2017, 04:54:28 pm »
i tried calling getBoundingBox immediately after setBoundingBox, the value i got was the small, original one, not the larger one i set.
but the javadoc says getBoundingBox triggers a recalculation, so getBoundingBox should output the original value, right?
but the javadoc says getBoundingBox triggers a recalculation, so getBoundingBox should output the original value, right?
33
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 09, 2017, 11:15:46 am »
i called setBoundingBox with larger values, then called getMesh().getBoundingBox(). i got the small , original values.
and i am sure my program doesn't change the BB after i call setBoundingBox.
and i am sure my program doesn't change the BB after i call setBoundingBox.
34
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 08, 2017, 08:52:41 am »
how to obtain the BB? i don't see getBoundingBox() method.
35
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 07, 2017, 09:20:31 am »
i am sure setboundingbox is called after build().
after i create the object3d, i call getMesh().compress() -> build() -> strip(), can these affect the result?
after i create the object3d, i call getMesh().compress() -> build() -> strip(), can these affect the result?
36
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:57:58 am »
my shader modifies vertex position so that the model look larger than the actual Mesh defined.
but the bound box is as large as the defined Mesh.
so if a small portion of the modified model should be visible but the defined Mesh is out of view, the model is not rendered.
so i want to enlarge the bound box to be the same as the modified model.
but it didn't work - the model is still not rendered if the defined Mesh is out of view.
but the bound box is as large as the defined Mesh.
so if a small portion of the modified model should be visible but the defined Mesh is out of view, the model is not rendered.
so i want to enlarge the bound box to be the same as the modified model.
but it didn't work - the model is still not rendered if the defined Mesh is out of view.
37
Support / Re: is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:55:12 am »
i tried setboundingbox at runtime, after build(), but i didn't see any effect - the bound box was still small.
38
Support / Re: shared shader but unshared uniform parameter?
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:50:56 am »
i found that it's not too much trouble.
39
Support / shared shader but unshared uniform parameter?
« on: June 05, 2017, 08:31:36 am »
http://www.jpct.net/forum2/index.php/topic,3965.msg27866.html#msg27866
i search the forum and found the above thread and maybe it's the same question as i have.
i hope to use 1 shader instance for multiple objects but their uniform parameters are different.
is the solution in the above thread the only solution?
is it more troublesome than using 1 shader for each object? is it worth the trouble?
i search the forum and found the above thread and maybe it's the same question as i have.
i hope to use 1 shader instance for multiple objects but their uniform parameters are different.
is the solution in the above thread the only solution?
is it more troublesome than using 1 shader for each object? is it worth the trouble?
40
Support / is result of setboundingbox permanent?
« on: June 05, 2017, 07:31:54 am »
i want to enlarge a bound box as the shader for the object3d enlarges the object.
after i setboundingbox, is there anything in the engine that may reverse the bound box back to the smaller one?
i ask this question because another engine would recalculate the bound box automatically.
after i setboundingbox, is there anything in the engine that may reverse the bound box back to the smaller one?
i ask this question because another engine would recalculate the bound box automatically.
41
Support / Re: How to do "Fog" in particular axis?
« on: June 05, 2017, 06:55:14 am »
i guess it is called "layered fog". it requires shader and quite much calculation.
but somtimes you can do fake fog - use a transparent plane with foggy texture.
but somtimes you can do fake fog - use a transparent plane with foggy texture.
42
Support / Re: render same Object3D in multiple worlds?
« on: May 21, 2017, 05:50:05 pm »
never mind this. i would use multiple Object3D with the same Mesh for my purpose.
43
Support / render same Object3D in multiple worlds?
« on: May 21, 2017, 07:10:31 am »
the doc says Object3d should be added to 1 world only.
i wonder if an Object3d is added to 2 worlds and render them, what will happen, - only for rendering purpose.
1 of the World is used for shadow.
because the Object3d should be isolated in shadow World by my design, so i have to use another World, or i must call setVisibility many times.
i wonder if an Object3d is added to 2 worlds and render them, what will happen, - only for rendering purpose.
1 of the World is used for shadow.
because the Object3d should be isolated in shadow World by my design, so i have to use another World, or i must call setVisibility many times.
44
Support / Re: add/reduce texture stages at runtime?
« on: May 21, 2017, 06:46:55 am »
i think using shader is a good way, thanks.
45
Support / add/reduce texture stages at runtime?
« on: May 19, 2017, 06:20:06 am »
i have a terrain with 3 tex stages, each with different UV scaling. it was created with textureInfo/polygonManager technique.
i found tex stages affect render speed - the more stages the slower, on a powerVR 544 gpu.
i wonder if i could reduce/add a tex stage(a noise tex in my case) depending on camera distance.
is there a way to do so?
i found tex stages affect render speed - the more stages the slower, on a powerVR 544 gpu.
i wonder if i could reduce/add a tex stage(a noise tex in my case) depending on camera distance.
is there a way to do so?